I was very pleased to be asked to contribute to a “Room for Debate” feature which asked the question: The Age of Anthropocene: Should We Worry?
The six contributors struck some similar notes. Many of us emphasized that the “Age of Man” could be a good thing for planet Earth, if we take the job seriously and do it well.
“We must also develop a new ethic and collective purpose, one that recognizes us as stewards of human and planetary well-being,” writes Jonathan Foley of the University of Minnesota. “Over time, we will only get better at being the guardian gods of Earth,” predicts Ronald Bailey, the science correspondent for Reason magazine.
But perhaps my favorite contribution was from Brad Allenby of Arizona State University. He took the opportunity to reevaluate not just the Earth, but the other half of the emerging concept of a human-dominated Earth: humans. “Indeed,” he writes, “the Earth today is characterized by complex adaptive systems that integrate human and natural components. And as humans increasingly integrate with the technology around them, and as the evolution of that technology continues to accelerate, it is questionable that what we will have in a couple of decades is still “Anthro.”




